data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d89e3/d89e305bbb89bfc8efe53c3ef5a8b811f9e62448" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d55e7/d55e70c489c70a56d3c1e02a54763b2528a1a3d5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5c4c/f5c4c0fafadc3423d5af00198442f15f9dc0ec12" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c436/4c436a2f04792063ea2ae936b0d137a6bb57ed75" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/031ad/031adc7f6c8eed7705042ded76717ab8a7a03b92" alt=""
weather its the full monte floral suity get up or just the black grounded floral moto jacket, these are some serious editorial favorites. I generally get extremely irritated when bogged down with spread after spread of the same stuff (we all remember the pages and pages of LV s&m kink of doily peter pan colors over molded sweater and leather waist-sinching belts, the oddles and oodles of givenchy pit bull and cougar printed jackets and skirts...you know; angry pastey model stands in junk yard amidst tv's she has just torched, flames to go with her unnaturally orange dye job. you know the one).
BUT, I think when magazines decide to dismiss the idea of attempting originality and stick to shooting the big items of the season its a really good chance to weed out the bad stylists from the good. In this post i've selected a bit of both just so we can get a feel for the contrast.
can you guess which ones i hate?
No comments:
Post a Comment